Torque Cars

boredom at work + curiosity = supercharger on 2.6v6 vectra b??

Discussion in 'Vectra' started by pattokbox, 22 June 2010.

  1. pattokbox

    pattokbox Full member

    Messages:
    19
    From:
    Australia, Canberra ACT
    Car:
    2000 Vectra 2.6 v6
    Hi people,

    Just out of curiosity and boredom. Would it be feasable / possible for a supercharger kit on the 2.6 vectra b engine. Would the cost completely out-weigh practicality or would it simply just not work. Ideas? Thoughts?

    Kind regards
    Patto
     
  2. BAD63R

    BAD63R Authorised Trader

    Messages:
    1,551
    From:
    Cornwall
    Car:
    MG TF135
    Hello mate. Yes it would work but the amount of money involved in silly for what you get. You would be better supercharging the 3.0 or 3.2 V6 as this will see you past the 300bhp mark. Expect around about £5000 for the conversion. There is one better that doesn't cost the earth ewhich is to fit the turbo from the Saab V6 turbo. The Saab engine is the same 3.0 that Vauxhall used (both GM so makes sense) and knockedc the car up to 250bhp without changing any of the internals. It's a low pressure turbo. Also if you decide to uprate the internals then you can fit a hybrid turbo and get some serious numbers.
     
  3. pattokbox

    pattokbox Full member

    Messages:
    19
    From:
    Australia, Canberra ACT
    Car:
    2000 Vectra 2.6 v6
    wow!! thats ludacris. so the 3.0 or 3.2, are they standard from the vectra C?? im in Aus so it can sometimes be hard to find that sorta gear for a vectra. And which saab turbo??
     
  4. Shonky

    Shonky New member

    Messages:
    9
    From:
    Wales
    Car:
    V6 Ka, 318is
    Saab 3.0 turbo, it has under piston oil squirters too which is a benefit over the X30XE, the bore is the same as the Vauxhall 2.0 turbo series but apparently Z20LEH pistons are the ones to use as they have the valve pockets in the correct place, the C20/Z20LET don't

    I did my X30XE the ghetto way by using spacers between the block and heads to decompress the engine:
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: 31 August 2010
  5. tjay56

    tjay56 Torque Junkie

    Messages:
    177
    From:
    essex..england
    Car:
    corsavxracing
    I'm pretty sure REGAL did a kit for the VECTRA.
     
  6. Shonky

    Shonky New member

    Messages:
    9
    From:
    Wales
    Car:
    V6 Ka, 318is
    I'm sure I read that regal didn't decompress the engine which is good for not having to fit after-market management but not good if you want to run some boost up it.
     
  7. Yugguy

    Yugguy Torque King

    Messages:
    4,789
    From:
    Rugby (expat Preston lad)
    Car:
    Merc C220Cdi Elegan
    Just bunging in the 3.2 from the Omega will give you 210bhp, 40 more than the standard 2.6. It's a relatively easy conversion too.
     
  8. BAD63R

    BAD63R Authorised Trader

    Messages:
    1,551
    From:
    Cornwall
    Car:
    MG TF135
    Surly the 3.0 is a better conversion if thats the case as that is 207bhp standard, and the 3.2 is 208bhp standard. I'd go for the weight save myself. The courtenay 3.0 that was put in the Calibra that I had previously was a 210bhp block as standrd (receipts to prove).
     
  9. Shonky

    Shonky New member

    Messages:
    9
    From:
    Wales
    Car:
    V6 Ka, 318is
    I don't know if the 3.2 is 208bhp because of emmisions but it should have a bit more torque than the 3.0.

    Aren't the 2.6 and 3.2's fly by wire? It won't make a difference if you're just using the block but bear it in mind if you want to use the ecu and stuff on a cable throttle etc.
     
  10. BAD63R

    BAD63R Authorised Trader

    Messages:
    1,551
    From:
    Cornwall
    Car:
    MG TF135
    Not sure about the 3.2 but yes the 2.6 is fly by wire. Has no HT leads either lol. But just done a bit os seraching and the 3.2 definatly seems to be 2 or 3 bhp more than the 3.0 but weighs a few more KG. Also, isn't the crank longer on the 3.2? Heard of peeps having to make special mounts to move the engine over a bit.
     
    Last edited: 2 September 2010
  11. Shonky

    Shonky New member

    Messages:
    9
    From:
    Wales
    Car:
    V6 Ka, 318is
    The 3.2 is a steel crank too, good for boost :)
     
  12. Yugguy

    Yugguy Torque King

    Messages:
    4,789
    From:
    Rugby (expat Preston lad)
    Car:
    Merc C220Cdi Elegan
    3.2 is basically a straight swap for the 2.6, whereas the 3.0 is a straight swap for the 2.5

    And aye, the 3.2 and 2.6 are just stroked versions of the earlier engines.
     

Share This Page

Click Here
  1. This site, like pretty much every other site, uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies, this may include third party cookies from our carefully selected advertising partners and for our analytics which allow us to see which pages are of interest and improve our site navigation and experience.
    You can disable cookies in your browser but this may affect your experience on this website.

    Dismiss Notice