the nsx is classed as a supercar,and because of this there not a supercar
the nsx is classed as a supercar,
now i didnt class it as 1, and in my eyes their not a supercar, just the fastest honda you can buy
but some fella in the motoring industry classed the nsx as a supercar
and its why i said if you want a reliable supercar, well its honda
and if i paid all that money on a supercar, i wouldnt want it to break down
its why i said the nsx
what supercar would you buy??
if i was buying a supercar, id want it to be specialThats my point exactly. I feel the same about the R8. I just wouldn't part with that money for an Audi.....
hey well said tb...i would not spend 100k on an audi either,yes reliable but its just not "right" money no object i would have a collection of classic supercars,i think they are the true supercars as at the time they were groundbreaking,unlike todays
heres 1 for you, youd like an american car with a huge engine, but thats a muscle caralso the cost, supercars normaly cost a bomb the £70k ish price for an NSX also made it rather cheaper.
what supercar would i buy ? mmm going to have to thing about that, would have said cobra but methinks it would most likely be classed as muscle - late 60s car with a big engine
yes there is, thats because the origanal gt40 was made in the 60s, so it always had the muscle bread, the new 1 is a supercar as it handles, thats a good point chrisgood answer pt...they i think are more supercar than muscle car simply because they actually handle,but yes there is the old muscle bit in there