turbo vs nasp engine sizes - Page 2

**pgarner** · 13-03-2008, 11:04 AM

yeah i think it was 1st designed by the M division could you imagine if they fitted it to a roadcar

**Izo Azlion** · 13-03-2008, 11:35 AM

Could you technically get say, a big fat VTEC engine, and shove a massive turbo and intercooler on it anyway? Surely then its both Turbo and NASP?

Whats that kind of power like? I'd imagine the turbo would kick in, in low RPM, giving low end torque, then the VTEC would hit at around 5500-6000rpm, an it'd be like a rocket...

...

Someone pass me an engine :P

**pgarner** · 13-03-2008, 01:06 PM

Nope if it has a turbo or supercharger fitted to it then its forced induction. NASP is Naturally Aspirated

it is possible to super/turbo charge hondas just costs a lot

for instance we were talking about the s2000 being one of the best flowed heads going about at 120bhp/ltr (240bhp 2 ltrs) i have heard of only 1 turboed s2000 in the uk and it was getting 350 but still had to be fully mapped he reckoned that final figs would be around 420.
A supercharged B16 engine would be expected to give 250

Search