22-08-2007, 11:17 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Junior Member Wrench Kid
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Kent UK
Posts: 18
| Speed cameras good or bad? What do you think about speed cameras. I really hate them especially since I got flashed the other day so Im waiting to see if the fine comes through. Do you reckin I can get off it somehow? |
| |
22-08-2007, 12:39 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Moderator Road burner Car: Pug 206 2.0 HDi
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: South Wales
Posts: 384
| How many people are insured to drive your car?
__________________ My Wheels: Peugeot 206, HDi 2.0 D-Turbo. |
| |
22-08-2007, 01:32 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Loyal Member Power tuner Car: 206 GTI 2.0 16v
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Leeds
Posts: 171
| I despise speed camera's. There purely there to generate revenue for the piggy wiggies! Annoying as it is a lot are just in foolish places. There's that many of them now though that any time i see a long stretch of road i'm always uncomfortable with cranking it up a notch as i always assume there'll be a camera hiding somewhere.
If you're ever unsure about whether or nto speed camera's are a good idea, simply watch Top Gear as there was an episode when Clarkson discussed them and listed off the facts that there had actually been more deaths WITH the speed camera's, than before they were put up. Madness and a complete waste of time!  |
| |
22-08-2007, 10:46 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Moderator The Torque Meister
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: SOUTH EAST
Posts: 1,008
| I hate the cameras. They're yet another Nanny state icon. They allow Mr and Mrs Self ****in Righteous to drive as badly as they've always driven on open, safe and de-restricted roads. Naturally, they rarely exceed 46mph, that being the speed that the Honda Civic; Vauxhall Astra etc can just about maintain in fifth gear without stalling. Curiously, they maintain the same 46mph in towns (where 30 is the posted limit). And still in 5th gear. |
| |
23-08-2007, 07:19 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Loyal Member Road burner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 275
| Speed and the use of speed cameras is another one of those things that instead of looking at it properly, they've just gone for a technology quick-fix. This in fact is having an adverse affect not only on driving safety but also on all manner of vehicle crimes.
Sure, I'm all for cameras, and adequate warning and slow down signs outside schools and in built up areas where 30 (and in some cases 20) mph speed limits should be strictly enforced. But there are some glorious, wide open roads with stupidly restrictive speed limits - never been an accident on them and yet they're still peppered with speed camaeras, just to make some quick cash.
Yes, there are roads that need lower speed limits because they can be dangerous; but there are also a lot of roads that in this day and age could have higher limits as well; some 40 roads that could be upped to the national speed limit. I also think that the national speed limit could be higher these days too, but I'm sure that's far too much fun for the government to allow us to have.
At the end of the day, stop controlling us with machines, put more flesh and blood police officers on duty and use some bl**dy common sense
__________________ Float like a Cadillac, Sting like a Beemer |
| |
23-08-2007, 08:02 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Administrator Torque King Car: A3 1.8T Sport
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Kent UK
Posts: 5,425
| They have started springing up on French roads as well now. Mainly motorways but they will spread like the proverbial plague.
__________________ I got complimented on my driving today. There was a little note on the windscreen; it said 'Parking Fine.' |
| |
23-08-2007, 09:43 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Loyal Member Power tuner
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 165
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by blacklineninja Speed and the use of speed cameras is another one of those things that instead of looking at it properly, they've just gone for a technology quick-fix. This in fact is having an adverse affect not only on driving safety but also on all manner of vehicle crimes.
Sure, I'm all for cameras, and adequate warning and slow down signs outside schools and in built up areas where 30 (and in some cases 20) mph speed limits should be strictly enforced. But there are some glorious, wide open roads with stupidly restrictive speed limits - never been an accident on them and yet they're still peppered with speed camaeras, just to make some quick cash.
Yes, there are roads that need lower speed limits because they can be dangerous; but there are also a lot of roads that in this day and age could have higher limits as well; some 40 roads that could be upped to the national speed limit. I also think that the national speed limit could be higher these days too, but I'm sure that's far too much fun for the government to allow us to have.
At the end of the day, stop controlling us with machines, put more flesh and blood police officers on duty and use some bl**dy common sense | I'm with you on this one mate. Yes ok, have them in the 20 30 mph areas near schools etc where they are needed. But no on roads where no accidents happen and are perfect for opening ya baby up a little  |
| |
24-08-2007, 12:27 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Member Wrench Pro
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 30
| I never really had a problem with regular speed cameras as I've fortunately never been in that much of a hurry that I couldn't slow down in the speed camera areas.
*However*, Average Speed Cameras are just plain annoying. The A2 and M4 are peppered with them as well as many other areas and you don't know if you're caught until a notice arrives in the post. They do work on numberplate recognition, which is hardly the most accurate identifier so it's a plus, but otherwise they're just annoying. I'm pretty sure that if the gaps between the cameras were wide enough, no one's average speed would be above 70mph because of traffic and road works. I drive from Bath to Kent on a semi-regular basis and I've never managed to travel the 160 miles in less than 2:30hrs. I really hate average speed cameras. |
| |
24-08-2007, 07:17 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Moderator The Torque Meister
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: SOUTH EAST
Posts: 1,008
| That's a very good point. Go and pick a nice safe stretch of road where it's safe to make brisk progress (eg. pass lorries, towing vehicles etc) and then install an average speed kit over, say, two miles. You'd make a mint.
I'm interested to know how evidence from such cameras stacks up in court. Has it been tested? In my opinion I think it would fall over as there is no actual photo of the offence being commited. If the start/end cameras took a piccy of your car/bike and it was below the speed limit I can't see how a mere calculation can be used as evidence for a conviction.
For example: distance between the cameras...
1. Was the tape measure or other device calibrated?
2. When?
3. By whom?
4. Did that person have accreditation to calibrate it?
See my point?
Anyone fancy a sprint along the A43 in Northants to test this? |
| |
27-08-2007, 11:17 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Moderator The Torque Meister Car: VW Bora (184.6bhp)
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Lockerbie, SW Scotland
Posts: 1,382
| ohhh how much i love living in dumfires and galloway were very lucky not to hAve any fixed cameras only the mobile 1's which are operatored by real police officers.
the advantage of this is that they can only sit in 1 place for 5 mins tops by that time everyone is warning each other
as for the specs cameras they have to be the biggest pain as they still work at night unlike gatsos so when you go up the motorway at night. ad it deserted you have to stick to 40 mph
__________________ -6 at half 8 in the morning.
Get out in your cars global warming isnt working yet |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM. | Search |