Quote:
Originally Posted by jarrus Bigger torque and longer ratios will make up for it without a doubt but my car is heavier that a punto though |
It does in the case of some of the more recent common rail engines. Funnily enough the biggest weakness I find with modern diesels is not the lack of 'revability' but more the fact that they really don't wanna know at idle speed.
I think this might be due to the current fad with modern diesels for lowering the compression ratio to reduce the clatter at cold idle. Even my 406 (2002 year model) was only about 19.5:1 compared to the more usual 22-24:1 ratio. Once under way the turbo sorts things out nicely but there is that latency below about 1300-1400rpm so you have to be pretty methodical with your choice of gears. Most petrols will tolerate being 1 cog too high at low speed.
The old 1.9 litre NA diesel Seat we had, however, pulled superbly from idle. Of course, things went downhill thereon in.
It is becoming more subjective all the time, and diesel engines have had massive investment made in the last decade. Blimey, even I've taken a liking to the things and I was the original diesel hater.
It is largely down to personal preference now regarding what you choose to drive.
Let's not kid ourselves, however.
No car is cheap to run anymore. The governemntal rules have made sure of this.